Bronze level automatically awarded GB final
This data has achieved Bronze level on 29 October 2014 which means this data makes a great start at the basics of publishing open data.
Signals passed at danger (SPADs)
Summary
- Type of release
- a one-off release of a set of related datasets
- Licence
- UK Open Government Licence
- Verification
- automatically awarded
- Release Date
- 8 March 2013
- Modified Date
- 10 May 2014
- Publishers
- Office of Rail Regulation
- Keywords
- infrastructure-railways, rail, rail-services, rail-transport, rail-travel, railway, risk, rssb, safety, signals-passed-at-danger, spads, trains-transport, transport
Community verification
Other people can verify whether the answers on this certificate are correct.
This certificate is automatically awarded.
Sign in to verify or report this certificate
Description
A signal passed at danger (SPAD) occurs when a train passes a stop signal without authority to do so. SPADs are assigned a numerical ranking between 0 and 28 based on the severity of the incident. Those SPADs ranked at over 20 are those with the highest potential for serious consequences, while those between 16 and 19 are considered to have less serious potential. Those ranked from 1 to 15 carry little or no risk. Source agency: Office for Rail Regulation Designation: Official Statistics not designated as National Statistics Language: English Alternative title: Signals passed at danger (SPADs)
General Information
-
This data is described at
http://data.gov.uk/dataset/signals_passed_at_danger_spads Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
This data is published by
Office of Rail Regulation Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
Legal Information
-
This data was
originally created or generated by its curator Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The rights statement is at
http://data.gov.uk/dataset/signals_passed_at_danger_spads Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
This data is available under
UK Open Government Licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
There are
yes, and the rights are all held by the same person or organisation Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The content is available under
UK Open Government Licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
This data contains
no data about individuals Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
Practical Information
-
The data appears in this collection
http://data.gov.uk Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
Social Information
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
title Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
description Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
publisher Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
keyword(s) or tag(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
distribution(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
release date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
modification date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know