Bronze level automatically awarded US beta

This data has achieved Bronze level on 23 October 2015 which means this data makes a great start at the basics of publishing open data.

Haw River sediment quality assessment

Summary

Type of release
a one-off release of a single dataset

Data Licence
Not Applicable

Content Licence
Creative Commons CCZero

Verification
automatically awarded

Release Date
24 April 2014
Modified Date
27 August 2015
Publishers
US Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior
Keywords
aquatic-survival-toxicity-tests, chironomus-dilutus, dam-impoundments, elemental-contaminants, environmental-contaminants-investigation, heavy-metals, hyallela-azteca, sediments
Identifier
haw-river-sediment-quality-assessment
Landing Page
http://catalog.data.gov/dataset/haw-river-sediment-quality-assessment
Maintainers
Richard Easterbrook richard_easterbrook@fws.gov

Community verification

Other people can verify whether the answers on this certificate are correct.

This certificate is automatically awarded.

Sign in to verify or report this certificate


Description

This report documents an evaluation of chemical contaminants in, and toxicity of, sediments collected from impoundments created by dams on the Haw River in Alamance and Chatham Counties, central North Carolina. Eighteen wholesediment samples from within the impounded reaches of Swepsonville Dam, Saxapahaw Dam, Bynum Dam, and B. Everett Jordan Dam were collected in June 2008. All samples were analyzed for elemental contaminants and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. All samples were also assessed with a battery of toxicity tests. Elemental contaminant concentrations in wholesediments were below those of toxicological significance. One or more sediment PAHs with freshwater sediment threshold effects screening values exceeded the screening values at 17 of the 18 sites, but no samples exceeded the probable effects concentrations. Survival of Hyallela azteca freshwater amphipod exposed to sediments from one of five sites in the Bynum Dam impounded reach was 80 and statistically lower than controls in 28d toxicity tests; amphipod growth was not affected at this or any other site. Whole sediments had no significant effect on survival or growth in 10d tests with Chironomus dilutus freshwater midge at any of the 18 sites. Results indicate the contaminants associated with the wholesediment samples were not chronically toxic to amphipods or midge. In 2d sediment elutriate waterextractable fraction tests with Ceriodaphnia dubia freshwater cladoceran, statisticallysignificant reductions in survival occurred in four of the 18 exposures two from the five samples taken from within the Bynum Dam impounded reach, one from the flooded portion of Big Alamance Creek, and one in the headwaters of Jordan Lake. Chromium in pore water at one of five sites in the Saxapahaw Dam impoundment was 119 gL; the State standard for chromium is 50 gL. Copper, lead, and zinc in the elutriate and pore water samples exceeded State standards infrequently but most commonly in sediments from the Saxapahaw Dam impoundment. This is an indication that aggressive resuspension of sediments like those tested could temporarily impair surface water quality. These data and surveys of sediment physical characteristics, volume, and likelihood of movement can be used together to infer the impacts the different types of sediments disturbing activities on shortterm water column chemistry. In particular, data regarding the modeled or measured sediment resuspension caused by specific sediment disturbing activities e.g., dredging, dam alterations, dam removal, etc. will help put the elutriate test results in context for a range of sediment management practices.


General Information


Legal Information

This dataset has been created by US Government which means it is required to be in the public domain. However US copyright law only allows open access by US citizens, we have assumed the data is equivalently licensed as CC0 for the rest of the world as this is in the spirit of the US Government’s Open Data policy.
  • The rights statement is at

    http://catalog.data.gov/dataset/haw-river-sediment-quality-assessment Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • Outside the US, this data is available under

    Creative Commons CCZero Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • There are

    yes, and the rights are all held by the same person or organisation Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The content is available under

    Creative Commons CCZero Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The rights statement includes data about

    its data licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • This data contains

    no data about individuals Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know


Practical Information

  • The data appears in this collection

    http://catalog.data.gov/organization/fws-gov Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The accuracy or relevance of this data will

    go out of date but it is timestamped Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The data is

    backed up offsite Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know


Technical Information


Social Information

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    title Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    description Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    identifier Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    landing page Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    publisher Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    keyword(s) or tag(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    distribution(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    release date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    modification date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation includes machine-readable data for

    temporal coverage Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation about each distribution includes machine-readable data for

    release date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation about each distribution includes machine-readable data for

    a URL to access the data Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation about each distribution includes machine-readable data for

    a URL to download the dataset Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • The documentation about each distribution includes machine-readable data for

    type of download media Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • Find out how to contact someone about this data at

    http://catalog.data.gov/dataset/haw-river-sediment-quality-assessment Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know

  • Find out how to suggest improvements to publication at

    http://www.data.gov/issue/?media_url=http://catalog.data.gov/dataset/haw-river-sediment-quality-assessment Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know