Bronze level automatically awarded US beta
This data has achieved Bronze level on 23 October 2015 which means this data makes a great start at the basics of publishing open data.
Haw River sediment quality assessment
Summary
- Type of release
- a one-off release of a single dataset
- Data Licence
- Not Applicable
- Content Licence
- Creative Commons CCZero
- Verification
- automatically awarded
- Release Date
- 24 April 2014
- Modified Date
- 27 August 2015
- Publishers
- US Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior
- Keywords
- aquatic-survival-toxicity-tests, chironomus-dilutus, dam-impoundments, elemental-contaminants, environmental-contaminants-investigation, heavy-metals, hyallela-azteca, sediments
- Identifier
- haw-river-sediment-quality-assessment
- Landing Page
- http://catalog.data.gov/dataset/haw-river-sediment-quality-assessment
- Maintainers
- Richard Easterbrook richard_easterbrook@fws.gov
Community verification
Other people can verify whether the answers on this certificate are correct.
This certificate is automatically awarded.
Sign in to verify or report this certificate
Description
This report documents an evaluation of chemical contaminants in, and toxicity of, sediments collected from impoundments created by dams on the Haw River in Alamance and Chatham Counties, central North Carolina. Eighteen wholesediment samples from within the impounded reaches of Swepsonville Dam, Saxapahaw Dam, Bynum Dam, and B. Everett Jordan Dam were collected in June 2008. All samples were analyzed for elemental contaminants and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. All samples were also assessed with a battery of toxicity tests. Elemental contaminant concentrations in wholesediments were below those of toxicological significance. One or more sediment PAHs with freshwater sediment threshold effects screening values exceeded the screening values at 17 of the 18 sites, but no samples exceeded the probable effects concentrations. Survival of Hyallela azteca freshwater amphipod exposed to sediments from one of five sites in the Bynum Dam impounded reach was 80 and statistically lower than controls in 28d toxicity tests; amphipod growth was not affected at this or any other site. Whole sediments had no significant effect on survival or growth in 10d tests with Chironomus dilutus freshwater midge at any of the 18 sites. Results indicate the contaminants associated with the wholesediment samples were not chronically toxic to amphipods or midge. In 2d sediment elutriate waterextractable fraction tests with Ceriodaphnia dubia freshwater cladoceran, statisticallysignificant reductions in survival occurred in four of the 18 exposures two from the five samples taken from within the Bynum Dam impounded reach, one from the flooded portion of Big Alamance Creek, and one in the headwaters of Jordan Lake. Chromium in pore water at one of five sites in the Saxapahaw Dam impoundment was 119 gL; the State standard for chromium is 50 gL. Copper, lead, and zinc in the elutriate and pore water samples exceeded State standards infrequently but most commonly in sediments from the Saxapahaw Dam impoundment. This is an indication that aggressive resuspension of sediments like those tested could temporarily impair surface water quality. These data and surveys of sediment physical characteristics, volume, and likelihood of movement can be used together to infer the impacts the different types of sediments disturbing activities on shortterm water column chemistry. In particular, data regarding the modeled or measured sediment resuspension caused by specific sediment disturbing activities e.g., dredging, dam alterations, dam removal, etc. will help put the elutriate test results in context for a range of sediment management practices.
General Information
-
This data is described at
http://catalog.data.gov/dataset/haw-river-sediment-quality-assessment Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
This data is published by
US Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
Legal Information
-
The rights statement is at
http://catalog.data.gov/dataset/haw-river-sediment-quality-assessment Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
Outside the US, this data is available under
Creative Commons CCZero Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
There are
yes, and the rights are all held by the same person or organisation Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The content is available under
Creative Commons CCZero Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The rights statement includes data about
its data licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
This data contains
no data about individuals Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
Practical Information
-
The data appears in this collection
http://catalog.data.gov/organization/fws-gov Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The accuracy or relevance of this data will
go out of date but it is timestamped Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The data is
backed up offsite Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
Technical Information
-
This data is published at
http://ecos.fws.gov/ServCatFiles/reference/holding/21722?accessType=DOWNLOAD Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The format of this data is
a standard open format Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
Social Information
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
title Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
description Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
identifier Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
landing page Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
publisher Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
keyword(s) or tag(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
distribution(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
release date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
modification date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
temporal coverage Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation about each distribution includes machine-readable data for
release date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation about each distribution includes machine-readable data for
a URL to access the data Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation about each distribution includes machine-readable data for
a URL to download the dataset Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation about each distribution includes machine-readable data for
type of download media Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
Find out how to contact someone about this data at
http://catalog.data.gov/dataset/haw-river-sediment-quality-assessment Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
Find out how to suggest improvements to publication at
http://www.data.gov/issue/?media_url=http://catalog.data.gov/dataset/haw-river-sediment-quality-assessment Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know