Datové sady / Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) In Neonatal Critical Care, 2013


Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) In Neonatal Critical Care, 2013

Vydavatel U.S. Department of Health & Human Services

Datum vydání před více než 9 roky

US
beta

Shrnutí

Co poskytovatel nabízí?
a one-off release of a set of related datasets

Databázová licence
Nevztahuje se

Licence na obsah
Creative Commons CCZero

Způsob ověření
ověřený automaticky

Popis

Neonatal Critical Care (NCC) Areas specialize in Level II/III and/or Level III critical care provided to newborns and infants. This table shows the hospital-specific central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) data and central line insertion practices (CLIP) adherence percent by patient care locations in Neonatal Critical Care Areas. The CLABSI data for each hospital neonatal care location include number of CLABSIs, central line-days and patient days, CLABSI rates per 1000 line days and their 95% confidence intervals. We also performed statistical analysis to determine whether the rates are statistically higher, lower, or no different than California average rates. California average rates for 2013 can be found at http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/hai/Documents/2013-CLABSI-T1.pdf. CLABSI rates are affected by clinical and infection control practices related to central line insertion and maintenance practices, patient-based risk factors, and surveillance methods. While stratifying CLABSI rates by patient care location makes rates more comparable, it cannot control for all individual patient factors that can affect CLABSI rates. A low CLABSI rate may reflect greater diligence with infection prevention or may reflect less effective surveillance methods that detect fewer infections, including failure to appropriately apply standardized surveillance definitions and protocols. Similarly, a high rate may reflect failure to consistently implement all recommended infection prevention practices or more aggressive infection surveillance including more consistent application of standardized surveillance definitions and protocols. Finally, readers should consider comparisons between two time periods cautiously, as more time is needed to determine if changes will be sustained, and therefore, more meaningful. To link the CDPH facility IDs with those from other Departments, like OSHPD, please reference the "Licensed Facility Cross-Walk" Open Data table at https://chhs.data.ca.gov/Facilities-and-Services/Licensed-Facility-Cross.... A list of healthcare facilities can be found at: https://cdph.data.ca.gov/Facilities-and-Services/Healthcare-Facility-Loc...