Bronze level automatically awarded GB final
This data has achieved Bronze level on 28 October 2014 which means this data makes a great start at the basics of publishing open data.
Housing design quality in London, the South East and the East of England from CABE 2004
Summary
- Type of release
- ongoing release of a series of related datasets
- Licence
- UK Open Government Licence
- Verification
- automatically awarded
- Release Date
- 24 March 2011
- Modified Date
- 28 February 2014
- Update Frequency
- discontinued
- Publishers
- Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment
- Keywords
- building-for-life, design, england, housing, housing-quality
- Temporal Coverage
- 1 January 2001 — 1 January 2004
Community verification
Other people can verify whether the answers on this certificate are correct.
This certificate is automatically awarded.
Sign in to verify or report this certificate
Description
An assessment of the design quality of 100 new housing schemes in London, the South East and the East of England. The assessment was carried out in 2004. The assessment is based on the Building for Life criteria. For each of the three Government Office regions, the top 10 house builders by volume were selected (based on most recent available data). For each top 10 house builder all schemes were completed between 1 Jan 2001 and 1 Jan 2004, over 20 units in size and of ‘Average’ Sales price. The attainable scores for each housing scheme varied from -48 (a ‘Poor’ standard scheme) to +48 (a ‘Very Good’ standard scheme). Each of the 16 audit criteria could receive a score of +3 to -3, which were added together to make up the total. Data for each housing scheme includes the housing scheme name, completion date, scores for individual criteria and total scores.
General Information
-
This data is described at
http://data.gov.uk/dataset/housing-design-quality-2004 Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
This data is published by
Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
Legal Information
-
This data was
originally created or generated by its curator Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The rights statement is at
http://data.gov.uk/dataset/housing-design-quality-2004 Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
This data is available under
UK Open Government Licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The content is available under
UK Open Government Licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
There are
yes, and the rights are all held by the same person or organisation Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
This data contains
no data about individuals Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
Practical Information
-
The data appears in this collection
http://data.gov.uk Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
This data changes
no Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
Technical Information
-
Releases of this data are listed at
http://data.gov.uk/api/rest/package/housing-design-quality-2004 Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
This data is
machine-readable Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
Social Information
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
title Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
description Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
release frequency Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
publisher Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
keyword(s) or tag(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
distribution(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
release date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
modification date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
temporal coverage Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know