Bronze level automatically awarded GB final
This data has achieved Bronze level on 28 October 2014 which means this data makes a great start at the basics of publishing open data.
National Joint Registry 9th Annual Report 2012
Summary
- Type of release
- a one-off release of a set of related datasets
- Licence
- UK Open Government Licence
- Verification
- automatically awarded
- Release Date
- 28 March 2013
- Modified Date
- 10 May 2014
- Publishers
- Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Communications@hqip.org.uk
- Keywords
- Health, hip replacement, joint, joint-replacement, knee-replacement, primary-hip-replacement-surgery
- Temporal Coverage
- 1 January 2011 — 31 December 2011
Community verification
Other people can verify whether the answers on this certificate are correct.
This certificate is automatically awarded.
Sign in to verify or report this certificate
Description
This dataset shows individual trust- and unit-level activity and outcomes for hip and knee replacement surgery in 2011 for the NHS and private sector. It has been reproduced from the full NJR 9th Annual Report 2012 and covers the specific period January to December 2011. The data published on this page only applies to England. The National Joint Registry of England, Wales and Northern Ireland (NI) publishes data from all territories, where achievable, as part of annual reporting process. The full NJR 9th Annual Report includes 2011 results for Welsh Health Boards (NI joined in 2013). The data shows information relating to how individual trusts and hospitals in England have performed against a range of key measures including whether they have been identified as an ‘outlier’ for revision rates. Key measures: Hospitals have been awarded a green (≥95%), amber (≥80%) or red (>80%) rating to reflect how well they performed in 2011 based on consent, compliance and linkability. Compliance information is published at trust-level. All other information is published by individual hospital in the NHS and private sector. Outlier analysis: Outlier analysis aims to identify ‘unusual differences’ in data from ‘normal variations’ which may indicate the need for further investigation. For revision rates, an outlier will be a hospital with an unusually high proportion of revision rates – more than would normally be expected. Outliers are identified by a 'Y.' The NJR has also listed the following information for each hospital: • Number of consultants • Average ASA grade • Percentage of male patients • Average age at operation • Percentage of 10A rated acetabular hip and femoral hip implants
General Information
-
This data is described at
http://data.gov.uk/dataset/national-joint-registry-9th-annual-report-2012 Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
This data is published by
Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
Legal Information
-
This data was
originally created or generated by its curator Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
This data is available under
UK Open Government Licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The content is available under
UK Open Government Licence Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The rights statement is at
http://data.gov.uk/dataset/national-joint-registry-9th-annual-report-2012 Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
There are
yes, and the rights are all held by the same person or organisation Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
This data contains
no data about individuals Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
Practical Information
-
The data appears in this collection
http://data.gov.uk Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
Technical Information
-
This data is
machine-readable Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The format of this data is
a standard open format Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
Social Information
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
title Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
description Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
publisher Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
keyword(s) or tag(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
distribution(s) Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
release date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
modification date Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know
-
The documentation includes machine-readable data for
temporal coverage Do you think this data is incorrect? Let us know